The Perils of Persistent Stalking
- Ground Proof Forensic Institute

- Jun 16
- 4 min read
Updated: Jul 9

Continuous stalking goes beyond mere infatuation or resentment. It is a behavioural phenomenon rooted in complex psychological, relational, and personality-based processes. Despite legal restrictions, social consequences, and clear distress to the victim, some individuals persistently pursue their targets with unwavering determination. Understanding this behaviour is essential not only for public safety but also for developing clinically informed risk assessments and interventions.
The psychology of attachment is key to understanding persistent stalking. Individuals with anxious or insecure attachment styles often depend on external sources for emotional regulation. When these sources are abruptly removed, such as after a romantic breakup, their internal distress can lead to intrusive behaviours. In this context, persistent stalkers are not merely seeking revenge or control; they are maladaptively trying to re-establish a connection they perceive as vital to their emotional stability. Research indicates that individuals with high attachment anxiety are overrepresented among ex-intimate stalkers and often engage in prolonged behaviours driven by rumination, emotional pain, and fear of abandonment.
However, not all stalking persistence is linked to seeking intimacy. In many instances, it arises from a compulsion for control and power. Here, the behaviour is less about emotional restoration and more about dominance. For these individuals, each act of intrusion (whether sending messages, monitoring, or approaching the victim) serves to reaffirm psychological superiority. Stalking becomes a tool to destabilise the victim, and the distress it causes reinforces the perpetrator's behaviour, encouraging them to continue.
Complicating matters further are individuals exhibiting delusional thinking or personality disorders. Erotomania, a delusional disorder where the person believes the victim is secretly in love with them, is often seen in cases involving public figures or casual acquaintances.
Additionally, traits associated with borderline or narcissistic personality disorders can drive persistent stalking. Those with borderline personality disorder, characterised by emotional instability and a strong fear of rejection, may alternate between idealising and devaluing others. Conversely, those with narcissistic traits may perceive rejection as an intolerable narcissistic wound, justifying stalking behaviours as necessary to restore their damaged self-image.
Key Predictors of Persistence
Stalking persistence is influenced by various factors, with the nature of the prior relationship being one of the strongest. Research shows that stalkers who had an intimate relationship with their victim are much more likely to continue their behaviour compared to those targeting strangers or acquaintances. This is likely due to the emotional investment and sense of entitlement often associated with romantic relationships. Furthermore, the specific motivation behind the stalking, whether driven by a desire for intimacy, resentment, or reconciliation, also affects the likelihood of persistence. Individuals with emotionally charged motives, especially those seeking to reunite or punish, tend to engage in stalking for longer periods.
Behavioural patterns provide further insight into the psychology of persistence. Recurrent instances of unwanted contact, escalation in methods (such as moving from emails to physical surveillance), and a previous history of stalking are linked to ongoing pursuit. These behaviours reveal not just an emotional fixation but also a rehearsal of actions, each act reinforcing the last, making it less likely for the behaviour to cease without external intervention.
A particularly challenging trait to manage in persistent stalkers is their fixation, an obsessive concentration on a specific person, often sustained by cognitive distortions and perceived interactions, whether real or imagined. This cognitive inflexibility is frequently accompanied by a significant lack of empathy. The inability to understand or care about the emotional suffering caused to the victim eliminates a crucial deterrent: guilt. Without empathy, there is no remorse, and the behaviour persists without being restrained by social or moral limits.
Another strong indicator of persistence is a documented history of past behaviour.
Individuals who have engaged in stalking in previous relationships or who show an increase in intrusive behaviours are at greater risk of ongoing harassment. These individuals are not acting on impulsive emotions; rather, they exhibit a behavioural pattern grounded in pathological thinking and reinforced by repeated success or emotional satisfaction.

Assessment and Intervention
Psychological and behavioural assessments are essential for understanding and managing chronic stalking. Tools like the Stalking Risk Profile (SRP) offer a structured method to evaluate the likelihood of continuation or escalation. These assessments consider the relationship context, psychological state, and motivational typology, providing a thorough overview of risk. Additionally, personality inventories like the MMPI-3 or attachment measures help clinicians identify underlying traits linked to prolonged stalking behaviour, such as narcissism, paranoia, and emotional instability.
Recognising persistent stalking as a psychological syndrome rather than just a criminal act allows for more effective interventions. Successful management requires a combination of legal measures and therapeutic approaches. Psychological treatment should be tailored to address the root pathology (such as attachment issues, delusional beliefs, or personality disorders) while consistently evaluating the risk of escalation.
In essence, the persistence of stalking behaviour arises from a combination of psychological needs, cognitive distortions, and personality dysfunctions. Individuals engage in stalking not only due to their emotions but also because of their perceptions: how they view themselves, others, and their role in a relational narrative they are often reluctant to abandon. As forensic professionals, it is essential to meticulously analyse these layers, create profiles based on empirical data, and design interventions that are both protective and rehabilitative. Only through such a nuanced understanding can we aim to disrupt the cycle of obsessive pursuit characteristic of the most concerning stalking cases.






Comments